Sir J.
J. Risky might see there ff. sin con he would like 1m present at the Siscursion)
8 copy til 1: Peking No 176 (R) of 4 Mch
VP.R. dour nos
with tobe fennt the question is
as
political rather Mantel
стру
This
is the result of
our recent conference
will- Fo.
The dift. was slown to.
us
for
concurrence before Sespalih, and it was
cd Itat
arranged explaining
62
shs. also telegraph to HK
the position rasking for. I keep in
brüch with Sir My. Lampson.
tel. in which Fo concur,
I submit dft.
and which
provides for repetition, with relevant portion
I Fo tel., to Singapore.
это
To make it quiti char at our confer.
the question to form the
that it was out f= question
priso
Chinge to modify their nationality law, and
that in consequence the proposals for facilitating
に
1: Sivestment of thinen nationality,
Lave Be abandoned.
would
Indeed, though
our
telmes. sent with their concurrence showed that
we had les SS rtk to hope for
an
arrangement
for Sivestment, Fo even look the line that they
had have conceived such
Ikat a working angt.
the Dutch was
on
an
augh. fossible.
the lines of that will
the utmost that we co. Lupe for.
The Dulit angl., which is briefly described
In Fo tel and fully
дооб
Seems loo
com can
Similar
set out in 42238/22,
Ich true and I
afraid that
hardly expect the thincar to give
a
its application
without nstricting
Even if Koo forores
angl. vay considerably.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.